Interview:
Item purchased: Sansumg Galaxy S5 phone
- What research preceded the
purchase?
“I compared specs side-by-side to the
Iphone 6 to see how the specific features stacked up to each other. I also wanted to look at pictures of the two
phones to see their relative size and weight.
It was important to me to feel like I was getting the best phone for the
price I wanted. I also wanted a phone
that was cool, trendy and small.”
- How does the consumer use the
product?
“I use my phone every day, for
everything, I am on it all the time and I need to have the best phone possible
to keep pace with my work.”
- What type of relationship does the
consumer have with the product? (i.e. emotional, practical.)
“I would say my phone knows more about
me than my girlfriend, I would acquaint my relationship to my phone like that
of a mother and son.”
- What things have gone wrong or
been surprisingly good?
“I would have to say that so far I am
pleased with my phone, however, I do notice that the overall hardware quality
is not as good as the Iphone 6.”
- Is the consumer satisfied or
unsatisfied?
“I am very satisfied, having a new
phone is like having a new way to connect with people and they get better every
year.”
In our fast-paced
world we inevitably encounter multiple forms of cognitive process as an after
effect of being able to process tremendous amounts of information. For example, errors in memory can affect how
someone might think about a particular event. This in turn influences how
someone may think about an associated event, which can lead to cognitive bias.
Cognitive biases can cause us to make fast and incorrect judgments, decisions,
and interpretations of information.
When
evaluating the new phone my interviewee used a metaphor or representative based
bias by using another commensurate phone to compare it to. In Jansson-Boyd,
(2010) a cognitive metaphor or representativeness is understanding of one idea,
in terms of another or in this case one phone in terms of another. Also, Iphones are considered the best phones
on the market so in order to create a benchmark, my interviewee used the Iphone
to establish the relative value of the Sansumg phone.
I also found that my
interviewee used predictive heuristics when deciding to purchase his
phone. While there was a ton of data on
the internet, including reviews and tech break-downs of the two phones In
question my interviewee only considered what he saw in the specs – which are
generally written by marketing staff.
Jansson-Boyd (2010) says that “Typically consumers only consider a small
part of all the information available to them about a specific product or
service and not all the information is attended to and processed,
(Jansson0boyd, 2010, P.132). This may
have led to his slight dissatisfaction with his choice.
Another
factor at play in my interviewee’s decision making process was cognitive
dissonance. My interviewee described wanting
to have the best phone but not pay as much for it. This is a great example where we have
conflicting internal desires (Jansson-Boyd, 2010) and the result was that my
interviewee bought a phone that was good, but not as expensive as the
Iphone. He has noticed that the quality
is not quite that of the Iphone, so he did pay less, but did he get the best
phone?
Another
type of bias that I noticed was the bandwagon approach or consensus
approach. Jansson-Boyd (2010) say that
the consensus bias is the credence we give to others peoples decisions. In this case my interviewee wanted a phone
that was “trendy,” which based on my own experience, it is. So he gave a lot of credence to what other
people were buying and overruled his previous experience as Iphones being
better.
What surprised me the
most was how much data is left on the table when people make decisions. Most people would like to think that we are
always making the best consumer decisions based on un-biased empirical data but
this is just untrue. It seems we more often
make emotional rather than reason based decisions.
By Ari Benjamin Morguelan
By Ari Benjamin Morguelan
References:
Jansson-Boyd,
Cathrine. (2010). Consumer Psychology. New York, New York: McGraw Hill
No comments:
Post a Comment